Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Chorazghiazad v. Holmes et al
as 3:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Chorazghiazad
Defendant:
Judge Barbara Holmes and Judge Aleta A. Trauger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RIGGS et al v. Bartlett, City of, Tennessee et al
as 2:2023cv02780
Plaintiff:
MR. DONALD RIGGS and CHRISTY RIGGS
Defendant:
Bartlett, City of, Tennessee, BENJAMIN ARMSTRONG, ZACHARY MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holmes v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc.
as 2:2023cv02712
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Holmes
Defendant:
Publix Supermarkets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fowler v. 17th Judicial Drug Task Force et al
as 4:2022cv00034
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Holmes Fowler
Defendant:
17th Judicial Drug Task Force, Shane George and Bedford County Sheriff Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00641
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
