Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00852
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Williams v. United States et al
as 1:2024cv00823
Plaintiff:
Jamiel Lawrence Williams
Defendant:
United States, State of Pennsylvania, Dr. Laurel R. Harry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KLIESH v. CASSIDY et al
as 2:2024cv01802
Plaintiff:
JOHN KLIESH
Defendant:
ANDREW G. CASSIDY, ROBERT O. BALDI and KRISTI B. HOOVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THEN v. HOOVER et al
as 2:2024cv01651
Plaintiff:
CARLOS THEN
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER JASON HOOVER, POLICE OFFICER MATTHEW WALSH, POLICE OFFICER JOEY BIANCHIMANO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
KIRBY v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2023cv02172
Plaintiff:
JESSICA KIRBY
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY, JACKIE HOOVER, REBECCA THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv04630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301 Uniformed Srvs. Employment & Reemployment Rights Act
VINOSKY v. CONSIGLIO et al
as 3:2020cv00134
Plaintiff:
SCOTT M. VINOSKY
Defendant:
OFFICER JOHN DOE, LEO BERG, MAUREEN LETCHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
