Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
INDIANA GREEN PARTY ET AL v. SULLIVAN
as 1:2022cv00518
Plaintiff:
Indiana Green Party, LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF INDIANA, John Shearer and others
Defendant:
HOLLI SULLIVAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PARKS v. HORN
as 2:2021cv00419
Plaintiff:
WARREN E. PARKS
Defendant:
GREGORY HORN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TYRA v. GOVERNERS OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2021cv01940
Defendant:
KIM HORN, DAVID TYRA, DOVOVEN PATRICK LAMB and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW J. TYRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01862
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
JONES v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES et al
as 1:2019cv00920
Defendant:
DAVID POWELL, WAYNE COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES, DAVID (LONNIE) MCCLINTOCK and others
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. SNOW et al
as 1:2018cv02291
Defendant:
CHARLES K. TODD, JR., GREG HORN and THOMAS SNOW
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS LEE JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04626
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
BATES et al v. STATE OF OHIO et al
as 1:2017cv01586
Plaintiff:
CLAYTON M BATES, MISTY C. BRICKLES, FAMILY AND KIN OF CLAYTON M. BATES and others
Defendant:
ANNEKA COLLINS, RICHARD M. DEWINE, KEVIN GREER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
