Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Harmon v. Alabama, State of et al
as 1:2021cv00947
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Claude Harmon, Jr
Defendant:
Alabama, State of, Calhoun County, Cleburne County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Childersburg Estates LP et al
as 1:2020cv01251
Plaintiff:
Diane Allen
Defendant:
Huff Management Co Inc and Childersburg Estates LP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ogles v. Buckner et al
as 2:2014cv00641
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lynn Ogles
Defendant:
Nancy Buckner , Angela McClintock , Toni Dollar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Storm et al(MAG+)
as 2:2011cv00882
Plaintiff:
Betty Jackson
Defendant:
Sandra Ross Storm and Brian Huff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dortch et al v. Rockwood Apartments et al
as 1:2011cv00518
Plaintiff:
Alicia Monique Dortch , Samantha Stewart , Carol Stewart and others
Defendant:
Rockwood Apartments, Rockwood of Monroeville Limited Partnership, Profit Moinvated and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Ponder v. Huff et al (MAG+)
as 2:2010cv00112
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Dale Ponder
Defendant:
Loretta E. Huff, Sherry E. Dallas, Oglethorpe County Sheriffs Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KPL et al v. Alabama State Board of Human Resources et al
as 2:2007cv00075
Plaintiff:
KPL and Karl Randolph Lentz
Defendant:
Alabama State Board of Human Resources, Bob Riley, Alabama Department of Human Resources and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
