Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Crook v. Ward et al
as 1:2024cv00793
Plaintiff:
Charmaine C. Crook
Defendant:
Alexandria Ward, Yolanda Mack, Fani T. Willis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05587
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (religion)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03544
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00236
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (religion)
Andrews v. D'Souza et al
as 1:2022cv04259
Plaintiff:
Mark Andrews
Defendant:
Dinesh DSouza, True the Vote, Inc., Catherine Engelbrecht and others
Amicus Curiae:
Campaign Legal Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Race Discrimination
Victory Media Group, LLC v. City of Roswell, Georgia et al
as 1:2022cv00897
Plaintiff:
Victory Media Group, LLC
Defendant:
City of Roswell, Georgia and Jackie Deibel
Farr v. CTG Hospitality Group, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00883
Plaintiff:
Thomas Allen Farr
Defendant:
CTG Hospitality Group, LLC doing business as Live! At The Battery, The Cordish Company, Liberty Media Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
