Cases 1 - 9 of 9
SHINE v. COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY et al
as 2:2023cv01952
Plaintiff:
BRYAN J. SHINE
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY, COUNTY OF CHESTER, COUNTY OF DAUPHIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ATKINS et al v. BOROUGH OF PHOENIXVILLE et al
as 2:2016cv04503
Plaintiff:
CRAIG ATKINS , ANDREW DUREN and JOEL DAVENPORT
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF PHOENIXVILLE, PHOENIXVILLE FIRE DEPARTMENT, FIRE DEPARTMENT JOHN ROES 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2015cv01052
Plaintiff:
MARK J. CARTER
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , ROLAND M. BUTLER , MAMMOUA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferris et al v. Milton S. Hershey Medical Center et al
as 1:2012cv00442
Plaintiff:
Scott Ferris and Jodi Ferris
Defendant:
Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Caitlin J. Mallis, M.D., Ian M. Paul, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROE v. SENECA VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2010cv00543
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
SENECA VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT, DONALD J. TYLINSKI, MARK KORCINSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODGERS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2010cv00954
Plaintiff:
THEODORE RODGERS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JANE DOE, POLICE OFFICER, JOHN DOE, POLICE OFFICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MAUDE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2009cv01767
Plaintiff:
JAMES MAUDE and JAMES MAUDE
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC., JANE DOE(S) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BAEZ v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY et al
as 5:2008cv04327
Plaintiff:
LUIS G. BAEZ, SR.
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC., SPRAGUE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LEWIS v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY et al
as 5:2008cv04296
Plaintiff:
HASON L. LEWIS
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC., SPRAGUE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
