Civil Rights Cases filed in Alabama
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00341
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00821
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00697
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Gartman v. Perry et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00534
Defendant: Lateshia Ball, Serilious Perry, James Pettway and others
Plaintiff: Trenton Gartman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv02168
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Muhammad v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00379
Plaintiff: Bernice Muhammad
Defendant: HSBC Bank USA, N.A., Option One Mortgage Corporation, Sirote & Permutt, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. HSBC Bank USA, NA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00617
Plaintiff: Bernice Muhammad
Defendant: HSBC Bank USA, NA, Merrill Lynch & Co., Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investore Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valdez-Ruiz v. City of Pelham, Alabama We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv02487
Defendant: City of Pelham, Alabama
Plaintiff: Juan Valdez-Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01754
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Type: Civil Rights None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?