Cases 1 - 8 of 8
SAMPEY v. TOWNSHIP OF WEST ORANGE et al
as 2:2024cv05691
Plaintiff:
AMANDA SAMPEY
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF WEST ORANGE, TOWNSHIP OF WEST ORANGE POLICE DEPARTMENT, Chief of Police JAMES ABBOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
MALAT v. BOROUGH OF SOMERDALE et al
as 1:2023cv02944
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL A. MALAT
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF SOMERDALE, JAMES ABBOTT and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CAMPBELL v. SOMERDALE POLICE DEPT. et al
as 1:2015cv03585
Plaintiff:
ALLEGRA CAMPBELL
Defendant:
SOMERDALE POLICE DEPT., KRISTOPHER AUSTIN, GARY PASSANTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. Suffolk County Police Departme
as 11-4038
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Thomas C. Wallace
Defendant - Appellant:
Suffolk County Police Department, County of Suffolk, Philip Robilotto and others
Wallace v. Suffolk County Police Dept.
as 11-2870
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Thomas C. Wallace
Defendant:
John Gallagher and James Abbott, Individually and in their official capacities
Defendant - Appellant:
Suffolk County Police Department, County of Suffolk and Philip Robilotto
Wallace v. Suffolk County Police Dept.
as 11-2881
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Thomas C. Wallace
Defendant:
John Gallagher and Philip Robilotto
Defendant - Appellant:
James Abbott, Individually and in their official capacities, Suffolk County Police Department and County of Suffolk
Wallace v. Suffolk County Police Dept.
as 11-2878
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Thomas C. Wallace
Defendant:
James Abbott, Individually and in their official capacities
Defendant - Appellant:
John Gallagher, Suffolk County Police Department, County of Suffolk and others
HAWKINS, II v. FEDDER et al
as 2:2007cv04005
Plaintiff:
ELDRIDGE HAWKINS, II
Defendant:
JOHN FEDDER, JAMES ABBOTT, JACK SAYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
