Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00469
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Ehrenfeld v. McDonough et al
as 6:2024cv03021
Plaintiff:
Jay Herbert Ehrenfeld
Defendant:
Denis McDonough, Merrick Garland and Charlotte Burrows
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00834
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00814
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Vaughn v. Ashcroft et al
as 6:2022cv03284
Plaintiff:
Curtis Dwayne Vaughn
Defendant:
John R. Ashcroft, Missouri Secretary of State Elections Office and John R. (Jay) Ashcroft
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dugger v. Jay's Corner Store et al
as 1:2022cv00089
Plaintiff:
DeAnna Kay Dugger
Defendant:
Jay's Corner Store, Jenkin Kikani and Madhu Kikani
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Brush v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv00570
Plaintiff:
Jay Brian Brush
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Brush v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv00032
Plaintiff:
Jay Brian Brush
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Taylor v. St. Louis County et al
as 4:2021cv01220
Plaintiff:
Rahn Taylor
Defendant:
St. Louis County, Herb Bernsen, Evelyn Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
