Cases 1 - 10 of 127
Sullivan v. Lamont et al
as 3:2024cv01003
Plaintiff:
Anna Sullivan
Defendant:
Anne Lamont, Kamala Harris, Ned Lamont and others
Clark v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2023cv01527
Plaintiff:
Gordon Clark
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Office of Governor Ned Lamont, Ned Lamont and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Trump et al
as 3:2023cv01145
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Facebook, Meta and others
Sign Pro, Inc. et al v. Town of Southington et al
as 3:2023cv00651
Plaintiff:
Sign Pro, Inc., Pro Realty LLC and Peter Rappoccio
Defendant:
Town of Southington and Jeffrey Pooler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00536
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Dappollonio et al v. Coventry CT Police Department et al
as 3:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
Andrew D Dappollonio, Andrew J Dappollonio and Dexene Dappollonio
Defendant:
Coventry CT Police Department, Provost, Michelle Krukoff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cashman et al v. King et al
as 3:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Cashman and Patricia Cashman
Defendant:
Kathleen King, Town of Clinton, Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Clinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Andrews v. Bianco
as 3:2022cv01335
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Andrews
Defendant:
Joseph F. Bianco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
