Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Corbin v. Karen et al
as 3:2023cv30006
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. Corbin
Defendant:
Karen and Joanne Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Desimone V Tarasuik et al
as 1:2022cv12222
Plaintiff:
Christopher Desimone
Defendant:
Ryan Tarasuik and JoAnn Bernard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Cottone et al v. Boston Public Health Commission et al
as 1:2022cv10285
Plaintiff:
Shana Marie Cottone, Denise Barrasso, Kelley Collins and others
Defendant:
Boston Public Health Commission, Exec Bisola Ojikutu, City of Boston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brody v. Medway, Town of et al
as 1:2021cv11799
Plaintiff:
Steven Brody
Defendant:
Town of Medway, Maryjane White, Dennis Crowley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanphy et al v. Reading School Committee et al
as 1:2021cv11138
Plaintiff:
Michele Sanphy and Matthew Sanphy
Defendant:
Reading School Committee, Reading Public Schools, The Town of Reading and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Janey et al
as 1:2021cv10502
Defendant:
Wilbur E. Commodore, Raul Leon, Kim Janey and others
Plaintiff:
Olivia Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Jones v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2020cv11825
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Michael Gomes, Daniel Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
Joann Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv11093
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv12050
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
