Cases 1 - 10 of 776
Davis et al v. Naphcare, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02496
Plaintiff:
Onika Davis
Defendant:
Naphcare, Inc., Fulton County, Georgia, Sheriff Patrick Labat and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Wrongful Death
Resendiz v. Christian et al
as 1:2024cv02452
Plaintiff:
Diana Resendiz
Defendant:
Officer Demetrius Christian, Clayton County, Georgia and John Doe(s) 1-3
Webber v. Georgia Department of Corrections
as 1:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Robert Webber
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections and John Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STROUD v. PARRELL et al
as 5:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY STROUD
Defendant:
STEPHEN PARRELL, JOHN DOES, CAPTAIN TRICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Love v. Kirby et al
as 2:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
David Eugene Love
Defendant:
Dane Kirby, Sgt. Kacy Godsey, Sgt. Katie Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Seal v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2024cv02117
Plaintiff:
Ryan Seal
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Officer Matthew Gordon and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Erickson v. Barmettler et al
as 1:2024cv02115
Plaintiff:
Matthew Erickson
Defendant:
Officer Jesse Barmettler and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Streiff v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2024cv02118
Plaintiff:
Jordan Daniel Streiff
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Officer Matthew Gordon and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Reynolds v. Minter et al
as 4:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Terry Darnell Reynolds
Defendant:
Roy Mintor, Savannah Chatham Metro Police Department, Vincent Pelligrini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
