Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Robinson v. Terry et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
James Robinson
Defendant:
Alcornelia Terry, John Q. Hamm and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miles v. Hamm et al
as 2:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Vernus Miles
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm and Chadwick Crabtree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Donald v. Hamm et al
as 2:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Angela Donald
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, John Crow and Gwendolyn Babers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Crafton v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Crafton
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, John Q. Hamm, Wendy Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hood v. Hamm et al
as 2:2023cv00717
Plaintiff:
Jeff Hood
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm and Terry Raybon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dotson et al v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv01657
Plaintiff:
Audrey Marie Dotson and Audrey South
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, John Q. Hamm, Greg Lovelace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gaddis et al v. Hamm et al
as 1:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gaddis
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, John Q. Hamm, Steve Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peden et al v. Gwathney et al
as 2:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
Terry Henderson Peden and The Law Group of THP, PLLC.
Defendant:
Leigh Gwathney, Dwayne Spurlock, Kay Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
McKee v. Dunn et al
as 2:2022cv00647
Plaintiff:
Denice McKee
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, John Q. Hamm, Patricia Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maya Hampton v. John Hamm, et al
as 22-10506
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAYA HAMPTON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN Q. HAMM, DEBORAH CROOK and ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
