Cases 1 - 10 of 30
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA v. BRADLEY et al
as 2:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Defendant:
AISHA ASHA BRADLEY, MICHAEL AMMANN, (16) PA SUPREME COURT PER CURIAM JANE/JOHN DOES for the June 26-23 and others
Cross Defendant:
SUMMIT PARK EAST, GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO., JUDGE PATRICK F. DUGAN, and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BLACKBURN v. SHANDOR et al
as 2:2023cv01358
Plaintiff:
JESSE L. BLACKBURN
Defendant:
PATROLMAN TRAVIS SHANDOR, CAPTAIN DAVID RUTTER, JUNE RYGELSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv04273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
THOMAS v. JUNE et al
as 2:2021cv03683
Plaintiff:
DARRON THOMAS
Defendant:
CHAD JUNE, ASHLEY BANKS, DANIELLE M. OUTLAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VANLOAN v. THE NATION OF ISLAM et al
as 2:2021cv02559
Defendant:
POLICE CHIEF DAVID NISLEIT, MAIN LINE HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., RICHARD ORLOW and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN VANLOAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv05827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv01683
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Garrett v. Pennymac Loan Services et al
as 3:2018cv00718
Plaintiff:
June Garrett
Defendant:
Pennymac Loan Services , Stanford L. Kurland , James K. Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
