Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Keel v. Waccamaw Mental Health et al
as 4:2022cv02973
Plaintiff:
Molly Keel
Defendant:
Waccamaw Mental Health, Mrs Johnson and Mr Fred Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Wilson et al
as 3:2021cv04108
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Alan Wilson and Mark Keel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keel v. Conway Police Dept. et al
as 4:2021cv02275
Plaintiff:
Molly Keel
Defendant:
Conway Police Dept., Horry County Police Dept. and Conway Health Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Doe v. Keel et al
as 3:2020cv02755
Defendant:
South Carolina Law Enforcement Division and Mark Keel
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keel v. Waccamaw Mental Health et al
as 4:2020cv00920
Plaintiff:
Molly Keel
Defendant:
Probate Judge Donna Lupo, Waccamaw Mental Health, Horry County Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant-Davis v. Wilson et al
as 2:2019cv00392
Defendant:
Matthew G Whitaker, Benjamin S Carson, Attorney General Alan Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
King Grant-Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Firriolo v. South Carolina Law Enforcement Division et al
as 3:2017cv03319
Plaintiff:
Thomas Raymond Firriolo
Defendant:
South Carolina Law Enforcement Division, Elizabeth Corley, Mark A. Keel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Assa'ad-Faltas v. Toal et al
as 3:2012cv02991
Plaintiff:
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas
Defendant:
Jean Toal, Daniel Shearouse, Mark Keel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aurora Technology Inc et al v. South Carolina, The State of et al
as 3:2012cv02844
Plaintiff:
Aurora Technology Inc , Phillip Caldwell and Phone-Sweeps LLC
Defendant:
South Carolina, The State of, South Carolina Law Enforcement Division and Mark Keel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
