Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-5288
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01377
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00882
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-5151
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jared Bedke, et al v. Kenneth Salazar, et al
as 12-35341
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JARED K. BEDKE, BRUCE BYRON BEDKE and MARTHA JEAN BEDKE
Defendant:
KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, Secretary of the Interior, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CASSIA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, RANDY KIDD, in his official capacity as Cassia County Sheriff, CARY BRISTOL, in his official capacity as Cassia County Undersheriff and others
David McDonald v. Kenneth Salazar, et al
as 12-5023
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David McDonald
Defendant - Appellee:
Kenneth Lee Salazar, Secretary, United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Diana V. Smith and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
