Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Torres v. Suffolk County et al
as 2:2014cv07514
Defendant: John Doe, Detective Gabor Kishegyi, Sergeant Patrick Marker and others
Plaintiff: Moises Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv03449
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv03421
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-1089
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv04989
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02855
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SPENCE v. THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS, ET AL
as 2:2009cv00460
Plaintiff: KEVIN SPENCE
Defendant: THE UNITED STATE CONGRESS, ET AL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type: Civil Rights None
SPENCE v. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD OF REVIEW LABOR
as 2:2007cv00443
Plaintiff: KEVIN SPENCE
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD OF REVIEW LABOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SPENCE v. DEPAUL
as 2:2007cv02221
Plaintiff: KEVIN SPENCE
Defendant: ROBERT DEPAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SPENCE v. SPENCE
as 2:2007cv00579
Plaintiff: KEVIN SPENCE
Defendant: SHERODE SPENCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?