Cases 1 - 10 of 250
Means v. Pegan et al
as 1:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Robert Means
Defendant:
Brandon Cox, CITY OF KENDALLVILLE, INDIANA, Kevin Pegan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01430
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
DUNLAP v. SCOTT et al
as 3:2024cv00126
Defendant:
MARIAM EFENGER, MARIAM HASKEL and THOMAS ALLAN SCOTT
Plaintiff:
KEVIN R. DUNLAP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SINGH v. COUNTY OF HENDRICKS, INDIANA
as 1:2024cv01077
Defendant:
COUNTY OF HENDRICKS, INDIANA
Plaintiff:
KEVIN C. SINGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watkins v. Webber
as 1:2024cv00245
Defendant:
Max C. Webber
Plaintiff:
Jenica Watkins
Pretrial Service:
Kevin Fitzharris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gydesen v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv00216
Defendant:
Jeremy Shelly, Ariana Papaik, Will Winston and others
Pretrial Service:
Scott Bunnell
Plaintiff:
Morris Gydesen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hawkins v. Mawhorr et al
as 1:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Kameron Hawkins
Defendant:
Adams County Sheriff Dan Mawhorr, Conrad Dyer, Cody Givens and others
Other:
Kevin Fitzharris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Other:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
TETMEYER v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2024cv00762
Plaintiff:
William Tetmeyer, Stefanie Straub and William Harting
Defendant:
City of Indianapolis, Sean Baukat, Trent Fortson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
