Cases 1 - 10 of 128
Johnson v. 1011778 B.C. Unlimited Liability Company et al
as 3:2024cv00687
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
1011778 B.C. Unlimited Liability Company, 1019334 B.C. Unlimited Liability Company, Burger King Canada Holdings Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
King et al v. Quad-R, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Dillon King and Allison King
Defendant:
Quad-R, Inc. doing business as Rae Products Tennessee, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
King v. 17th Judicial Drug Task Force et al
as 1:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
David Michael King
Defendant:
17th Judicial Drug Task Force, Steven Daugherty and Casey Cordova
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00457
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
King v. Knox County Board of Education
as 3:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
Angie King
Defendant:
Knox County Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Windless v. Avergis et al
as 2:2022cv02754
Plaintiff:
Demetra Elaine Windless
Defendant:
Doctor John Avergis, Doctor Mary Keegan, Lisa Canady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VanHooser v. Grundy County Municipal Unit et al
as 4:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Tara VanHooser
Defendant:
Grundy County Municipal Unit, Grundy County Sheriff's Department, Clint Shrum and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hill v. State Farm et al
as 1:2022cv00032
Plaintiff:
Anthony B. Hill
Defendant:
State Farm, TDCI, AT&T and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
