Cases 1 - 10 of 449
EZEKWO v. ST. PHILLIP NERI, CATHOLIC CHURCH, BRONX, NEW YORK et al
as 1:2024cv08824
Defendant:
JOHN DIBATTISTA, RICHARD COPPOLA, MONSIGNOR KEVIN SULLIVAN and others
Plaintiff:
IFEOMA EZEKWO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bellinger v. THE CITY OF PERTH AMBOY et al
as 2:2024cv08442
Defendant:
PO JESSICA DEJESUS, THE CITY OF PERTH AMBOY, DET. BENJAMIN BATISTA and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Curtis Bellinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
DODSON v. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
as 2:2024cv08407
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DODSON
Defendant:
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SHAIKH v. SCHRON et al
as 3:2024cv08249
Defendant:
JACKSON POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN DOES 1-10, LAURA L. GERMADNIG and others
Plaintiff:
ZIA SHAIKH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv07971
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv07972
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
SHAIKH v. MORSE et al
as 2:2024cv07916
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY MOTOR VEHICLE COMMISSION, ROBERT J. JONES, KEVIN H. MORSE and others
Plaintiff:
ZIA SHAIKH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DODSON v. COOPERMAN BARNABAS MEDICAL CENTER
as 2:2024cv07920
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DODSON
Defendant:
COOPERMAN BARNABAS MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06619
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
SHAH v. TURNER III et al
as 3:2024cv05988
Plaintiff:
PETER I. SHAH
Defendant:
JOHN G. TURNER III, PATRICIA M. KIPNIS, ELLIOTT C. MCGRAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
