Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Card v. Tacoma Municipal Court et al
as 3:2024cv05007
Plaintiff:
Tony Lamar Card
Defendant:
Tacoma Municipal Court, All City Bail Bonds, Jonathan Lack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Card v. Christel et al
as 3:2024cv05005
Plaintiff:
Tony Lamar Card
Defendant:
David W Christel, Tiffany M Cartwright and Grady J Leupold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Card v. Leupold
as 3:2023cv06152
Plaintiff:
Tony Lamar Card
Defendant:
Grady J Leupold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Card v. King County Superior Court et al
as 2:2023cv01343
Plaintiff:
Tony Lamar Card
Defendant:
King County Superior Court, Jonathan Lack, Aimee Sutton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Card v. Tacoma Municipal Court et al
as 3:2023cv05781
Plaintiff:
Tony Lamar Card
Defendant:
Tacoma Municipal Court, Randall Hanson, Steve Krupa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. City of Seattle et al
as 2:2018cv01170
Defendant:
William C Schwarz, Q Martin, R Behn and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Lamar Williams, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Lamar Culp, et al. vs. Benton County, et al.
as 2:2014cv00088
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamar Culp , Earmer Lee Culp and K.M.C.
Defendant:
Benton County , Steven Keane, Darrell Isaacson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Azpitarte v. King County et al
as 2:2010cv01186
Plaintiff:
Richard Azpitarte
Defendant:
King County, Denobi Olegba, Elizabeth Deraitus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Azpitarte v. King County et al
as 2:2007cv01998
Plaintiff:
Richard Azpitarte
Defendant:
King County, Ron Sims, Susan Rahr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
