Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Richardson et al v. Toyota Motor Credit Corporation et al
as 4:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
Sherri M. Richardson and Morich Land Enterprise, Inc.
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Credit Corporation and Lexus Financial Services Toyota Lease Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
XI Chi Clan Nation et al v. Barry, et al.
as 3:2020cv00739
Respondent:
Justin L. Krik, Esq., Bank of America, Office of the Sheriff and others
Claimant:
Guale Yamassee Juris Consul Office, Be Kind and Unified Foreign Private Family Indigenous Trust, Guale Yamassee Compliance Department and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
Meeks v. The City of Danville et al
as 4:2020cv00029
Defendant:
John Pulley, The City of Danville, Jacob Amos and others
Plaintiff:
Eldridge Roosevelt Meeks, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00710
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Creed v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2012cv00317
Plaintiff:
John P. Creed
Defendant:
Glendell Hill , Charles Land , Peter A. Meletis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00685
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv00042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
