Cases 1 - 10 of 18
KLAYMAN v. KOLLAR-KOTELLY
as 1:2023cv03773
Plaintiff:
LARRY KLAYMAN
Defendant:
Hon. COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY and COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Klayman v. Porter et al
as 9:2022cv81295
Plaintiff:
Larry Klayman
Defendant:
Julia Porter, Hamilton Fox, III, Myles Lynk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Klayman v. Porter et al
as 9:2022cv80642
Plaintiff:
Larry Klayman
Defendant:
Julia Porter, Hamilton Fox, III and Matthew Kaiser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
KLAYMAN v. PORTER et al
as 1:2022cv00953
Plaintiff:
LARRY KLAYMAN
Defendant:
JULIA PORTER, HAMILTON FOX III and MATTHEW KAISER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Klayman v. Porter et al
as 9:2022cv80270
Plaintiff:
Larry Klayman
Defendant:
Julia Porter, Hamilton Fox, III and Matthew Kaiser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
KLAYMAN v. KELLY et al
as 1:2021cv02536
Plaintiff:
LARRY KLAYMAN and LARRY ELLIOT KLAYMAN
Defendant:
TIMOTHY J. KELLY, TREVOR N. MCFADDEN and DABNEY L. FRIEDRICH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KLAYMAN v. BLACKBURNE-RIGSBY et al
as 1:2021cv00409
Defendant:
ROY MCLEESE, VANESSA RUIZ, JOHN M. STEADMAN and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY KLAYMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KLAYMAN v. LIM et al
as 1:2018cv02209
Defendant:
JULIA PORTER, ELIZABETH HERMAN, Esther Lim and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY KLAYMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KLAYMAN v. FOX et al
as 1:2018cv01579
Defendant:
JULIA PORTER, ELIZABETH HERMAN, H. Clay Smith III and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY KLAYMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larry Klayman, et al v. Barack Obama, et al
as 17-10653
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY KLAYMAN and DEMETRICK PENNIE
Defendant - Appellee:
PRESIDENT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., LOUIS FARRAKHAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
