Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Liles v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2024cv00416
Plaintiff:
KyrieAnna Liles
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, Sacramento County Sheriff's Department, Jim Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parker-Liles et al v. Garcia et al
as 2:2015cv00894
Plaintiff:
Ciarra Parker-Liles and Marquita Figures
Defendant:
Steven Garcia and Shane Raftery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker- Liles et al v. Garcia et al
as 3:2015cv00110
Plaintiff:
Ciarra Parker- Liles and Marquita Figures
Defendant:
Steven Garcia and Shane Raftery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013at00468
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Kountze et al v. Kountze et al
as 4:2012cv05079
Petitioner:
Edward Kountze, Jean Bolden, Marlena Kountze and others
Respondent:
Charles Denman Kountze, James Mitchell, Michael Trafficante and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cooke et al v. Liles et al
as 1:2012cv01844
Plaintiff:
Alan A. Cooke and Gage T. Cooke
Defendant:
Terry Liles, Murl Harpham, Steve Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Andoh v. City of South Lake Tahoe et al
as 2:2010cv02053
Plaintiff:
John Andoh
Defendant:
City of South Lake Tahoe, South Lake Tahoe Police Department and Russell Liles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andoh v. City of South Lake Tahoe et al
as 2:2010at01122
Plaintiff:
John Andoh
Defendant:
City of South Lake Tahoe, South Lake Tahoe Police Department and Russell Liles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
