Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00805
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv03161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Employment Discrimination (Race)
Hobson v. Local 689, Amalgamated Transit Union AFL-CIO
as 8:2023cv02405
Plaintiff:
Barry Hobson
Defendant:
Local 689, Amalgamated Transit Union AFL-CIO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Employment Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 jb Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Taccino et al v. City of Cumberland, MD. Local Government et al
as 1:2022cv00226
Plaintiff:
Carol Taccino and William Taccino
Defendant:
City of Cumberland, MD. Local Government, Allegany County, MD. Local Gov't, Jennifer Clem and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Mercer v. Amalgamated Transit Union Division 689 et al
as 8:2021cv03274
Plaintiff:
Linda Mercer
Defendant:
Amalgamated Transit Union Division 689, Amalgamated Transit Union, Raymond Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
