Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Bailey, III v. Jezierski et al
as 3:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
Howard A Bailey, III
Defendant:
Eric Jezierski, Daniel Byrd, Gayle Lois Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
HAMILTON v. LOOP et al
as 4:2020cv00196
Defendant:
JACQUELINE WENNING, FLOYD COUNTY HEALTH DEPT., JEFF EASTRIDGE and others
Plaintiff:
JARRETT HAMILTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOWLER v. HAYWARD et al
as 1:2019cv03398
Defendant:
KARL A. SHIVELY, OLUFOLAKEMI O. AWE, THOMAS Z. HAYWARD, 3rd and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID L. FOWLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00668
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierce v. Zoetis, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00082
Plaintiff:
Kellie Pierce
Defendant:
Zoetis, Inc. and Lois Heuchert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
WILLIAMS et al v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2013cv01375
Defendant:
ROBERT CARRIER, ROBERT CARRIER, V., CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS and others
IMPD:
INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
LEON WILLIAMS and LOIS WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Trask v. Bish et al
as 2:2013cv00001
Plaintiff:
Lois Trask
Defendant:
Joan Bish, Cannon Cochran, Horseshoe Casino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
