Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Armstrong et al v. City of Long Beach, Mississippi et al
as 1:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Richard W. Armstrong, Harry Bradshaw, Judith Bradshaw and others
Defendant:
City of Long Beach, Mississippi, Michael Gundlach, Louis Dewitt Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Walton et al v. Long et al
as 1:2020cv00040
Defendant:
John Does 1-25, J. B. Long and City of Verona
Plaintiff:
Aliven Walton and Thomas Walton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Martinez et al v. Hancock County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2018cv00354
Defendant:
Hancock County, Mississippi, Milton Aric Latschar, John Doe # 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Martinez and Marcos Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00310
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Goree v. City of Verona et al
as 1:2017cv00093
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Goree
Defendant:
City of Verona and J. B. Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blakney v. Fed Ex et al
as 1:2016cv00368
Plaintiff:
J. T. Blakney
Defendant:
Fed Ex, U.S. Postal, ATT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Blakney v. City of Long Beach, MS et al
as 1:2016cv00201
Plaintiff:
J. T. Blakney
Defendant:
City of Long Beach, MS, Advance Auto, Walgreen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Montgomery et al v. Long et al
as 1:2014cv00127
Plaintiff:
Blondie Montgomery , Henry Tallie and Christopher Montgomery
Defendant:
J. B. Long, Aaron Andrew and The City of Verona, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
