Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Warren et al v. State Of Texas et al
as 4:2023cv01738
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Warren and Sharon Warren
Defendant:
State Of Texas, Mark D Cronenwett, Mackie Wolf Zeintz and Mann PC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Haywood et al v. Texas Realator et al
as 3:2022cv02174
Plaintiff:
Tianikwa Haywood and Paul-Douglas Celestine
Defendant:
Texas Realator, Mackie Wolf Zientz Man PC Law Firm, Sanford & Kurland and others
Petitioner:
DHI Title
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Parson v. US Bank et al
as 3:2019cv02330
Defendant:
Mackie Wolf Law Firm, US Bank and Select Portfolio Servicing
Plaintiff:
Bridget Parson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dudley v. Niell et al
as 3:2015cv01434
Plaintiff:
Howard Blain Dudley
Defendant:
J. Niell, Dale Hannah, Assistant District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dudley v. Niell et al
as 6:2015cv00145
Defendant:
Jim Burnham, Officer Cody Burris, Mayor Douglas Scott Cain and others
Plaintiff:
Howard Blain Dudley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dudley v. Bridewell et al
as 3:2014cv01331
Plaintiff:
Howard Blain Dudley
Defendant:
Wayne Bridewell , Dale Hannah, Larry Chambliss and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stone Mountain Trust et al v. Mackie Wolf & Zientz PC et al
as 3:2013cv00658
Plaintiff:
Stone Mountain Trust and David M Wethy
Defendant:
Mackie Wolf & Zientz Mann PC, Israel Saucedo, Michael W. Zientz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00540
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00737
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
