Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Goins v. Corley et al
as 3:2023cv00081
Plaintiff:
Jason Goins
Defendant:
Corporal Marty Corley, Agent Clyde Grass, Agent Larry Koebcke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
of the house of Stutzman et al v. Gatt et al
as 3:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
ruth-ann of the house of Stutzman, r. j. and a. h.
Defendant:
Stephanie A. Gatt, P. Joseph Hass, Jr., Michael J. Caywood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
of the house of Stutzman et al v. Gatt et al
as 1:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
ruth-ann of the house of Stutzman, r. j. and a. h.
Defendant:
Stephanie A. Gatt, P. Joseph Hass, Jr., Michael J. Caywood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Bauer v. Corley et al
as 3:2022cv00406
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jason Bauer
Defendant:
Marty Corley, F Rodriguez, J Holaway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bauer v. Corley
as 3:2022cv00202
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jason Bauer
Defendant:
Marty Corley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bauer v. Corley
as 3:2021cv00843
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jason Bauer
Defendant:
Marty Corley and Michigan City Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Corley et al
as 3:2019cv00280
Defendant:
Steve Westphal, Officer Jessy, Ken Havlin and others
Plaintiff:
Eric L Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Herny et al
as 1:2016cv00044
Plaintiff:
Nick J Martin
Defendant:
Marty Herny, Tommy Essiex, Coca Cola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01849
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MOTE v. HOWARD COUNTY et al
as 1:2012cv01602
Defendant:
Lt. ROBIN BYERS, HOWARD COUNTY, MONA MYERS and others
Plaintiff:
JARED MOTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
