Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Sanchez v. Almond, et al
as 1:2024cv00319
Defendant:
JOSEPH ALMOND, DANIEL J. MCKEE and ANTONIO AFONSO
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL SANCHEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cronan v. The State of Rhode Island et al
as 1:2024cv00207
Defendant:
Daniel Ballirano, Kerry Travers, Rep Terri Cortvriend and others
Plaintiff:
Laurie Cronan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hafner v. McKee et al
as 1:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Eric Hafner
Defendant:
Daniel J. McKee, Peter F. Neronha and Gregg Amore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Amesbury v. Burnes et al
as 1:2022cv00255
Plaintiff:
Mark E. Amesbury d/b/a Polytecnic
Defendant:
Hannah Burnes, David Goldstein, Donald Grebien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clervrain et al v. Raimondo et al.
as 1:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Fridelyne Maisoneuve
Defendant:
Gina Raimondo, Sheldon Whitehouse, Jack Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Skoly v. McKee et al
as 1:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
Dr Stephen T Skoly, Jr
Defendant:
Daniel J. McKee and Dr James McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
