Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Michael McMahon et al v. The City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2023cv09815
Plaintiff:
Michael McMahon, Teresa Batson, Jeannine Bedard and others
Defendant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Eric Garcetti, Karen Bass and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv07296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ong v. County of Amador et al
as 2:2020cv00253
Defendant:
County of Amador, Bob Bianchi, Justin Cardinale and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lee Ong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ong v. County of Amador et al
as 2:2020at00111
Defendant:
County of Amador, Bob Bianchi, Justin Cardinale and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lee Ong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv04996
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wade v. Zambrano et al
as 1:2015cv06542
Defendant:
City of New York, Michael Parks, Michael Weber and others
Plaintiff:
Che Wade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
McCalman et al v. Zaytsev et al
as 1:2013cv04805
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe 1 through 10,, Police Officer Saeed Nieves and Police Officer Yevgeniy Zaytsev
Plaintiff:
Sharon McCalman and Michael Parkes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jefferson v. City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv02103
Defendant:
City of New York, Police Officer John Doe, Detective Keith McDowell and others
Plaintiff:
Terrance Jefferson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
13231 Sundance LLC v. Sean Park
as 11-55710
Plaintiff - Appellee:
13231 SUNDANCE LLC
Intervenor - Appellant:
SEAN MICHAEL PARK, pro se
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTINE CRONIN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
