Cases 1 - 10 of 160
Sconiers v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv12425
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Henry Fenrick and Gus Harrison Correctional Facility
Plaintiff:
catonya sconiers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11886
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Abcumby v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2024cv11445
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Steven Adamson, Annette Tellas and others
Plaintiff:
Keshuna Abcumby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Doe et al v. Nessel et al
as 1:2023cv11655
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Tim Brown
Defendant:
Dana Nessel, Anica Letica, One Court of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Leavitt v. Michigan Department of Corrections
as 1:2023cv00577
Plaintiff:
Patrick Leavitt
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00563
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv11177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Simpson v. Michigan Department of Corrections
as 1:2023cv00504
Plaintiff:
Paul Simpson
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10995
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
