Cases 1 - 8 of 8
ELLIS et al v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2023cv02450
Plaintiff:
PRINCE R. ELLIS, MICKEY M. ELLIS and VERONA E.T. ELLIS
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE COMPTROLLER PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH DEPT., THE OFFICE OF COMPTROLLER OPERATIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PARKER v. HAALAND et al
as 2:2022cv05049
Plaintiff:
JAMAL DARIUS PARKER Moor Beneficiary a Emperor, a Noble a Merchant, Admiral, Piloter, Seaman, Mariner, Shereef in propria persona Sui Juris, majoris aetatis suae d/b/a Jamal El Trust
Defendant:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND d/b/a Debra Anne Haaland, secretary of the interior et al.,, MERRICK BRIAN GARLAND d/b/a MERRICK GARLAND attorney general et al.,, ANDREW MARSHALL SAUL d/b/a ANDREW SAUL commissioner et al., and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Loftus Adjustment Company et al
as 1:2020cv00512
Defendant:
Jherion Levesque, Doe 1, Frank Hurst and others
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Williams, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
MULDROW v. BRYANT et al
as 2:2011cv05925
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MULDROW
Defendant:
TIMOTHY BRYANT, MILAN MERKE and JOHN DOE POLICE OFFICERS 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MULDROW v. MERKE et al
as 2:2011cv05898
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MULDROW
Defendant:
MILAN MERKE and JOHN DOE POLICE OFFICERS 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv03233
Plaintiff:
DARRYL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , BRANDON BRYANT and MILAN MERKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01005
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
MILAN et al v. PYROS et al
as 2:2008cv00320
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MILAN, KATHLEEN KLEINMANN and TRIPIL SERVICES
Defendant:
KYRK A. PYROS, RONALD DEVERSE, PYRSQUARED GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
