Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Doe v. Board of Visitors, Virginia Military Institute
as 6:2023cv00052
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Board of Visitors, Virginia Military Institute
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 - Title IX of the Education Amendment of 1972
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301 Uniformed Services Employment & Re-employment Rights Act - USERRA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
SAS Associates 1, LLC et al v. City Council for the City of Chesapeake, Virginia
as 2:2021cv00491
Plaintiff:
SAS Associates 1, LLC and Military 1121, LLC
Defendant:
City Council for the City of Chesapeake, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv00028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Doe v. Board of Visitors of Virginia Military Institute et al
as 7:2020cv00058
Defendant:
Board of Visitors of Virginia Military Institute, Ryan A. Hoops, Brayden A. Carver and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 - Title IX of the Education Amendment of 1972
Kirchhoff, M.D. v. United States Government et al
as 7:2018cv00489
Defendant:
Department of the Army, Law offices of William S. Arimony, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Kirchhoff, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
