Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv08037
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ed Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Goldstein v. The Bowery Defendants et al
as 1:2024cv05683
Defendant:
Kathy Doe, The Trust Defendants, Julie Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse S. Goldstein, Esq.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Feimann et al v. County of Clinton et al
as 8:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Ronald Feimann, Gary Francis Whitney, Jr, Tonia Lehoisky and others
Defendant:
County of Clinton and Kimberly Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05606
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Noto v. Bowery Mission
as 1:2023cv04343
Plaintiff:
Anthony Vincent Noto
Defendant:
Bowery Mission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
He v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv03214
Plaintiff:
Xuejie He
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, State of New Jersey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv07531
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
The Holy Spirit Association for the Unification of World Christianity v. Barreto et al
as 1:2022cv04019
Plaintiff:
The Holy Spirit Association for the Unification of World Christianity
Defendant:
Mickey Barreto and Mickey Barreto Missions
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv08851
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
