Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
James v. McDonough
as 2:2023cv02386
Plaintiff:
Ms. Quinique James and Quinique James
Defendant:
United States Department of Veterans Affairs and Denis McDonough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Clark v. Jackson
as 1:2021cv00303
Plaintiff:
Ms. Rachel Clark and Rachel Clark
Defendant:
William L. Jackson and William L. Jackson Official Capacity as the CEO of Chattanooga-Hamilton Hospital d/b/a Erlanger Health System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02101
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Undetermined:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones Cage v. Victoria's Secret Stores, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv02868
Defendant:
Officer Justin Lewis, Victoria's Secret Stores, LLC and Town of Collierville
Plaintiff:
Ms Jovita Jones Cage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv02755
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Smith v. Bell et al
as 2:2011cv00360
Plaintiff:
Edward Cook Smith
Defendant:
John Bell, Ms Davis, Ms Amy Ball and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Camacho v. USA et al
as 2:2011cv02483
Plaintiff:
Kathy Camacho
Defendant:
USA, State Of Mississippi, State of Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
