Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Carberry v. Darlington County School district Represented et al
as 0:2024cv01991
Plaintiff:
Alexis Carberry
Defendant:
Darlington County School district Represented, Tim Newman, Carla Jefferson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv05029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Carberry v. Darlington County School District Represented et al
as 0:2023cv04565
Plaintiff:
Alexis Carberry
Defendant:
Darlington County School District Represented, Tim Newman, Carla Jefferson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hutson v. Harper et al
as 2:2023cv03543
Plaintiff:
M.B. Hutson
Defendant:
Thomas L. Harper, Esq., R. Wayne Byrd Estate, John Wilkerson, Esq. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv01488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv01912
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv00614
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)
Carroll et al v. Brown and Brehmer Attorneys at Law et al
as 2:2020cv02781
Defendant:
Dale Lang, Jr, Disciplinary Counsel Lesley, M Coggiola and others
Plaintiff:
Marion Bochette, Johnny Ann Carroll and Robert M Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00174
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rahim v. Thrash et al
as 9:2017cv00896
Plaintiff:
Ras Imhotep Rahim
Defendant:
Thomas Thrash, Jr, Jane Doe Thrash, Harold L Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
