Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv05429
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv06525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00842
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Scott et al v. Annucci et al
as 1:2015cv01202
Plaintiff:
Kathy Scott and George Santiago
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Daniel F. Martuscello and John A. Shipley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pray et al v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision et al
as 8:2014cv01015
Plaintiff:
James D. Pray and New York State Correctional Officers and Police Benevolent Association, Inc.
Defendant:
New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Anthony J. Annucci, Daniel F. Martuscello, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-1526
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-2150
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00869
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lester Crandall v. David
as 10-985
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Lester Crandall
Defendant:
Michael J. Martuscello, Police Officer, Amsterdam Police Department, individually and officially
Defendant - Appellee:
Alberto David, New York State Police Investigator, individually and in his official capacity
ed-george v. Burns et al
as 1:2009cv00869
Plaintiff:
ed-george
Defendant:
Kathleen Burns, Anthony Kalimeras, Jeff Cohen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
