Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Gaither v. Deal et al
as 1:2020cv00360
Defendant:
Sheena Black, James Deal and Marty Allen
Plaintiff:
Russell Gaither
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hillis v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2020cv00026
Defendant:
Augusta University, Marty Allen, M.D. Marcus Occhipinti and others
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00175
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler v. The Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2018cv00170
Plaintiff:
Alicia Butler
Defendant:
The Georgia Department of Corrections , The Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia , Georgia Correctional Healthcare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Robert Heard v. Marty Allen, et al
as 17-11043
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT HEARD, "Soldier"
Defendant - Appellee:
MARTY ALLEN, FRANK SOSEBEE, HALL COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Baldwin v. Bryson et al
as 6:2016cv00166
Plaintiff:
Debra Renee Wenndt Baldwin
Defendant:
Homer Bryson , James F. Degroot , Marty Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEARD v. ALLEN et al
as 7:2016cv00166
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HEARD
Defendant:
MARTY ALLEN, FRANK SOSEBEE, HALL COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEARD v. ALLEN et al
as 7:2016cv00014
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HEARD
Defendant:
MARTY ALLEN, CALVIN ORR and GIBSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAINION et al v. VALDOSTA STATE PRISON et al
as 7:2015cv00174
Plaintiff:
VENESSA CAINION and WINNIE HANFORD
Defendant:
VALDOSTA STATE PRISON , BRIAN OWENS , RICK JACOBS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heard v. O'Kelley et al
as 2:2014cv00213
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
William C. O'Kelley, Richard W. Story, Agent Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
