Cases 1 - 10 of 101
Bey v. Jars Cannabis Dispensary et al
as 2:2024cv01353
Plaintiff:
Miyana Sa'kira Nubian Bey
Defendant:
Jars Cannabis Dispensary, Matthew Dubkinsky and Sarah Stalker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gagne et al v. Mesa, City of et al
as 2:2024cv01337
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gagne and Suzette Gagne
Defendant:
Mesa, City of, Kevin Cost, Lee Rankin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ring v. Chandler, City of et al
as 2:2024cv00630
Plaintiff:
Nancy Ring
Defendant:
Chandler, City of, Kristoffer Buchanan, Samuel Wagner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02552
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Roethler v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2023cv01934
Plaintiff:
Timothy Roethler
Defendant:
Maricopa County, Matthew Shay and Maricopa, County of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ronet v. United States of America et al
as 2:2023cv01461
Plaintiff:
Jean-Pierre Ronet
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of Veterans Affairs, Bryon C Matthews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00859
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Fantel v. Brutinel et al
as 2:2023cv00227
Plaintiff:
John Fantel
Defendant:
Robert Brutinel, Pamela Sue Frasher Gates, Doug Ducey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rose v. Farney et al
as 3:2022cv08055
Plaintiff:
Michael Rose
Defendant:
Matthew Farney, Jose Cardenas, Devin Godfrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
