Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 Family and Medical Leave
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Harward et al v. City Of Austin et al
as 1:2021cv00095
Plaintiff:
Michael Gillette, David May, Jo Ann Wiersema and others
Defendant:
Austin Community College and City Of Austin
Petitioner:
Mark Mathias
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pennie v. Martin et al
as 3:2019cv01945
Plaintiff:
Demetrick Pennie
Defendant:
Mayes Media Group, Dallas Police Association's Assist the Officer Foundation, Inc., Thomas Popken and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Willis v. Mayes et al
as 1:2018cv00471
Defendant:
Tom Mayes and Patricia Oliver
Plaintiff:
Diane Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00933
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ross et al v. Hopkins County Texas et al
as 4:2016cv00095
Plaintiff:
Shelley Ross , Tony Ross and Estate of Tony Chance Ross
Defendant:
Hopkins County Texas , City of Sulphur Springs, Texas , Brad Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Guillen v. The State of Texas et al
as 5:2013cv00598
Plaintiff:
Ismael Narsico Guillen
Defendant:
Eugene Mayes, Jason Nolan and The State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv02216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
