Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Bostick & Associates Business and Legal Consulting Group, LLC v. Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, et al
as 1:2022cv02505
Defendant:
Maryland, Grace Communion International, Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences and others
Plaintiff:
Bostick & Associates Business and Legal Consulting Group, LLC, Christina J. Bostick, C.B.T. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2520 Civil Damages for Interception Wire or Oral Communications
Hodge v. McDonald's Corporation et al
as 8:2022cv01138
Plaintiff:
Harold Hamilton Hodge, Jr.
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation, Chris Kempczinski, McDonald's Restaurant of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv Civil Rights
Aigbedion v. Prince George's County et al
as 8:2021cv00830
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Aigbedion
Defendant:
Andrew McClean, Kenneth McDonald, Melvin C. High and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv00592
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Osagie v. McDonalds Corp
as 1:2020cv03535
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Osagie
Defendant:
McDonalds Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Corbitt v. Baltimore City Police et al
as 1:2020cv03431
Defendant:
Joseph Allen, Rebecca Jackson, Jeffrey Rivera and others
Plaintiff:
Terrell Corbitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01871
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lundregan v. Hayes et al
as 8:2019cv01596
Defendant:
Janice Lindo McDonald, Susie Bell Whittley, Renee Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Karen Lundregan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
