Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01607
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01925
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
MERRITT v. BANACH et al
as 5:2019cv02784
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER MEHMETI BESTULLAH, JUDGE KELLY L. BANACH, ALLENTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MERRITT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MERRITT v. MANCINI et al
as 5:2019cv02785
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MERRITT
Defendant:
S BAT, MICHAEL MANCINI, POLICE DEPARTMENT OF ALLENTOWN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00833
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
WILSON v. COALSON et al
as 2:2019cv00863
Defendant:
UNIDENTIFIED OFFICER, OFFICER RAYMOND M LARE, OFFICER MERRITT J. HARMAN and others
Plaintiff:
OMAR WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hickey v. McGinley et al
as 4:2018cv01793
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Hickey
Defendant:
Brian Davis, Denise Austeel, Renee Kerr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MERRITT v. RIMMER et al
as 5:2018cv02910
Defendant:
CORSI, RIMMER, ROBERT DONCHEZ and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MERRITT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WEST et al v. CHESTER TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2018cv02077
Plaintiff:
DAVID WEST
Movant:
TEHUTI LINDO EL
Defendant:
CHESTER TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, BROOKHAVEN MUNICIPAL COURT, STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EL v. CHESTER TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2018cv00771
Plaintiff:
TEHUTI LINDO EL
Defendant:
CHESTER TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, BROOKHAVEN MUNICIPAL COURT, RAYMOND M LARE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
