Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00776
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Violation of Fair Labor Act of 1938
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Alston v. Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals et al
as 2:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Ms. Phyllis M Alston and Phyllis M Alston
Defendant:
LANKENAU MEDICAL CENTER, Main Line Health, CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
MITRECIC v. ELITE TRANSIT SOLUTIONS, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00210
Defendant:
ELITE TRANSIT SOLUTIONS, LLC, MICHAEL D. JOHNSON and JANE/JOHN DOE
Plaintiff:
NAFISA MITRECIC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
VASQUEZ v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2020cv00016
Defendant:
Lt. DAVIS, DEREK F. OBERLANDER, MICHAEL D. OVERMYER and others
Plaintiff:
RICARDO MORALES VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00083
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01656
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
ANGLEMEYER et al v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY et al
as 5:2019cv03714
Plaintiff:
ADA ANGLEMEYER, JEFFREY ANGLEMEYER, JOSEPH KLUSKA and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOE OFFICER, OFFICER HAPPEL, DET SRGT MELINSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
