Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Truong et al v. Stitt et al
as 5:2022cv00491
Plaintiff:
Mac Truong, NARAL Pro-Choice America, Kevin McCarthy and others
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Greg McCortney, Charles McCall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv02294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv16508
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Sabo et al v. Aurora
as 1:2019cv04837
Plaintiff:
Robert Duke, Robert Gatewood, Rodney Campbell and others
Defendant:
City of Aurora
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory Garmong v. Nevada Supreme Court, et al
as 17-15715
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY GARMONG
Defendant - Appellee:
NEVADA SUPREME COURT, JAMES W. HARDESTY, Justice, KRISTINA PICKERING, Justice and others
Garmong v. Nevada Supreme Court, et al
as 2:2016cv00718
Defendant:
Michael A. Cherry, Michael Douglas, Mark Gibbons and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Garmong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jacobsen v. Douglas et al
as 2:2016cv00489
Defendant:
Drew Christiansen, Michael Douglas, Esq. Willard Ewing and others
Plaintiff:
Craig L. Jacobsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. DOUGLAS
as 1:2014cv01774
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA BROWN
Defendant:
MICHAEL DOUGLAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weddell v. Russell et al
as 3:2014cv00115
Defendant:
Michael A. Cherry, Michael Douglas, Mark Gibbons and others
Plaintiff:
Rolland Weddell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael Douglas, et al v. Town of Portola Valley, et al
as 10-17804
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL DOUGLAS and LISA DOUGLAS, as individuals and as Trustees of the Douglas Family Trust
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWN OF PORTOLA VALLEY, a public entity, WEST BAY SANITARY DISTRICT, CHRISTOPHER BUJA, an individual and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
