Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Robinson v. T Mobile et al
as 2:2023cv00581
Plaintiff:
Vickie L. Robinson
Defendant:
T Mobile, T Deutsche US Inc, AT&T and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00625
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Religion)
Robinson v. Cox Cable LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00265
Plaintiff:
Vickie L. Robinson
Defendant:
Cox Cable LLC and Metro by T. Mobile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Robinson v. Metro by T. Mobile et al
as 2:2023cv00266
Plaintiff:
Vickie L. Robinson
Defendant:
Metro by T. Mobile and Cox Cable
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00554
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Religion)
Maybush et al v. Putze et al
as 3:2022cv00597
Plaintiff:
Ronald Maybush and K. M.
Defendant:
Peggy Putze and Putze's Mobile Home Park
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00809
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Giron de Reyes et al v. Waples Mobile Home Park Limited Partnership et al
as 1:2016cv00563
Plaintiff:
Rosy Giron de Reyes , Jose Dagoberto Reyes , Felix Alexis Bolanos and others
Defendant:
Waples Mobile Home Park Limited Partnership, Waples Project Limited Partnership and A.J. Dwoskin & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
