Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Vernon et al v. South Oxford Management et al
as 3:2023cv01485
Plaintiff:
Brandon Vernon and Monica Nugent
Defendant:
South Oxford Management, Ariq Rose, Camila Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Noga v. Santilli et al
as 3:2020cv00780
Defendant:
Athena Meadowbrook, LLC, Athena Health Care Systems MA R, LLC, Athena Health Care Associates, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Bernadette Noga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00494
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Szymonik et al v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2018cv00263
Plaintiff:
Peter T. Szymonik and Monica L. Szymonik
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Jorge Simon, Leslie Olear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Avdevich et al
as 3:2016cv01883
Plaintiff:
Monica Young
Defendant:
Richard Avdevich and Town of Waterford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act
Fore et al v. Connecticut Light & Power et al
as 3:2013cv00822
Plaintiff:
Monica Fore
Defendant:
Connecticut Light & Power, William P. Herdegen, III, Joaquina Borges King and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Bradley v. Abrams et al
as 3:2011cv00238
Plaintiff:
Anne M. Bradley
Defendant:
Corey Spruill, Jane Doe, Terrance Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
