Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Williams v. Canton Public School District et al
as 3:2019cv00927
Defendant:
Andrew Grant, Les Penn, Erik Gilkey and others
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stokes v. Longley et al
as 3:2018cv00847
Defendant:
Officer A. Gibson, Warden Archy B. Longley, Warden S. Mosely and others
Plaintiff:
Ezra Lamond Stokes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sudduth v. Lowndes County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2018cv00051
Plaintiff:
Mose Lee Sudduth, Jr.
Defendant:
Lowndes County, Mississippi, Roger Coleman and North Atlantic Security Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Graham v. City of Cleveland, Mississippi et al
as 4:2018cv00004
Defendant:
Ladaster Green, Chief Charles Bingham, Ronnie Livingston and others
Plaintiff:
Kenyarda Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00914
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Harrison et al
as 3:2016cv00055
Plaintiff:
Moses I. Lewis, Jr.
Defendant:
LaShunda Harrison, Alice Stapleton, Blondie Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stokes v. Longley et al
as 3:2015cv00418
Plaintiff:
Ezra Lamond Stokes
Defendant:
Archy B. Longley, S. Mosely, A. Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00475
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Harris et al v. Yazoo County Board of Education et al
Plaintiff:
Thomas Harris, Clifton Haralson, Christine Wilkerson and others
Defendant:
Yazoo County Board of Education , W. C. Martin, E. H. Selby and others
Intervenor:
Rebecca Fisher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
