Cases 1 - 10 of 12
MAGGITTI v. MAHON et al
as 2:2023cv04359
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
WILLIAM P. MAHON, JOHN HALL, DEBRA TODD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kress v. Zoning Hearing Board of Sugarloaf Township et al
as 3:2023cv01389
Plaintiff:
Harry J. Kress, Jr.
Defendant:
Zoning Hearing Board of Sugarloaf Township, Timothy Mundie, George Maue and others
Not Classified By Court:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv04710
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Mundis v. Rutters Farm Store Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv01316
Defendant:
State of PA, Northern Regional Police, Northern York County Regional Police and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Earl Mundis
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
CRAWFORD v. CORIZON HEALTH, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00113
Plaintiff:
ANDREA CRAWFORD
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH, INC. , CORIZON, INC. , ALLEGHENY COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEDRO v. CENTENNIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2015cv04963
Plaintiff:
CARMENCITA MARIA PEDRO
Defendant:
CENTENNIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, JOYCE MUNDY, ISRAELA FRANKLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUSE v. II-VI INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2013cv00065
Plaintiff:
AMBROSIO ROUSE
Defendant:
II-VI INCORPORATED, BRUCE GLICK, CSABA SZELES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Lucarelli v. Mundy et al
as 3:2010cv02450
Plaintiff:
Charles Lucarelli
Defendant:
Hugh Mundy and Joseph Cosgrove
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
