Civil Rights Cases
Jeffrey Butler v. Conrad Lamont, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-3016
Plaintiff - Appellant: JEFFREY BUTLER
Defendant - Appellee: CONRAD LAMONT, individually and in his official capacity as a corrections official, TODD BUSKIRK, Individually, and his official capacity as warden of Northampton County Prison, ARNOLD MATOS, Individually and his official capacity as Director of Corrections and others
Jeffrey Butler v. Conrad Lamont, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-1263
Plaintiff - Appellant: JEFFREY BUTLER
Defendant - Appellee: CONRAD LAMONT, Individually, and his official capacity as a Corrections Official, TODD BUSKIRK, Individually, and his Official Capacity as Warden of Northampton County Prison, ARNOLD MATOS, Individually and His Official Capacity as Director of Corrections and others
Debtor - Appellee: JOHN STOFFA, Individually and His Official Capacity as County Executive
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv01730
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MISERO v. CHRISTINE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2012cv07081
Plaintiff: THOMAS MISERO
Defendant: JACOB MATTHEW CHRISTINE, LUIS VANGA, TOD BUSKIRK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv03206
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00788
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights Both
NEGRON v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRISON
as 2:2007cv04005
Plaintiff: ROBERT F. NEGRON
Defendant: NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?